Reduce the carbon emissions of the construction industry, compare the differences between aluminum, PVC and ASA windows

  • Home
  • Blog
  • custom_cate
  • Reduce the carbon emissions of the construction industry, compare the differences between aluminum, PVC and ASA windows


Reduce the carbon emissions of the construction industry, compare the differences between aluminum, PVC and ASA windows


As the global focus on sustainability grows, the construction industry is under increasing pressure to reduce its carbon footprint. One important factor is the choice of building materials, especially windows. The comparison table below outlines the carbon emission factors associated with aluminum, PVC and ASA windows. By understanding carbon emissions from raw material production to final product, stakeholders can make more informed decisions to support sustainable environmental practices.

Aspect Aluminum Windows PVC Windows ASA Windows
Raw Material Production Aluminum production involves high carbon emissions. PVC production involves relatively lower carbon emissions. ASA plastic production has moderate carbon emissions.
  - Primary aluminum production: 8-12 tons CO2/ton aluminum - PVC resin production: 1.9-3.2 tons CO2/ton PVC - ASA plastic production: 2-6 tons CO2/ton plastic
Processing and Manufacturing Aluminum processing and surface treatments add to emissions. PVC processing and manufacturing have lower energy consumption and emissions. ASA plastic processing and manufacturing also have moderate energy consumption and emissions.
  - Processing emissions: Varies based on treatment methods - Processing emissions: 0.5-1.5 tons CO2/ton plastic - Processing emissions: 1-3 tons CO2/ton plastic
Total Emission per Ton Approximately 6-9 tons CO2/ton of aluminum windows Approximately 2.4-4.7 tons CO2/ton of PVC windows Approximately 3-9 tons CO2/ton of ASA windows
Total Emission per Square Meter 90-135 kg CO2/m² (assuming 10-20 kg/m²) 18-35 kg CO2/m² (assuming 5-10 kg/m²) 22.5-67.5 kg CO2/m² (assuming 5-10 kg/m²)
Conclusion Higher overall carbon footprint due to raw material production and processing. Lower overall carbon footprint, making it more environmentally friendly. Moderate carbon footprint, with a balance between aluminum and PVC.


Aluminum Windows Carbon Emission Breakdown


  1. Raw Material Production:
    Bauxite extraction and refining to aluminum oxide, then primary aluminum production: 8-12 tons CO2/ton aluminum.
  2. Processing and Manufacturing:
    utting, assembling, surface treatments like anodizing or painting.
  3. Total Emission:
    6-9 tons CO2/ton, 90-135 kg CO2/m² (assuming weight 10-20 kg/m²).


PVC Windows Carbon Emission Breakdown


  1. Raw Material Production:
    PVC resin production: 1.9-3.2 tons CO2/ton PVC.
  2. Processing and Manufacturing:
    Converting resin to window profiles, assembling: 0.5-1.5 tons CO2/ton plastic.
  3. Total Emission:
    2.4-4.7 tons CO2/ton, 18-35 kg CO2/m² (assuming weight 5-10 kg/m²).


ASA Windows Carbon Emission Breakdown


  1. Raw Material Production:
    ASA plastic production: 2-6 tons CO2/ton plastic.
  2. Processing and Manufacturing:
    Converting ASA resin to window profiles, assembling: 1-3 tons CO2/ton plastic.
  3. Total Emission:
    3-9 tons CO2/ton, 22.5-67.5 kg CO2/m² (assuming weight 5-10 kg/m²).


Summary


  • Aluminum Windows: High carbon footprint, primarily due to energy-intensive aluminum production.
  • PVC Windows: Lower carbon footprint, less energy-intensive in raw material production and processing.
  • ASA Windows: Moderate carbon footprint, with a balance between the higher emissions of aluminum and the lower emissions of PVC.


For more precise data, conducting a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) tailored to specific production methods and regional factors is recommended. If you need further specific case studies or regional data, please let me know.
Maybe you would like read more: